Posts Tagged ‘master’

People who are against any form of KE (and various forms do exist) usually insist on challenging the idea that KE is temporary. This means that they believe either KE is eternal or non-existent in the first place. (For the record, I believe it is temporary. I lay out that argument here.) Let’s assume for the sake of argument that KE is not temporary. What are the ramifications of that position for the following passage? (more…)

Advertisements

(more…)

(more…)

(more…)

(more…)

(more…)

(more…)

(more…)

(more…)

(more…)